Archive for October, 2009

FCC Ready to Kill Internet

Accord­ing to Reuters, FCC com­mis­sion­ers voted 5–0 today to pro­ceed with craft­ing a “net neu­tral­ity” rule, send­ing the cur­rent lan­guage (which would strip tele­com com­pa­nies of the right to con­trol how they use their own prop­erty) to the print­ing office for pub­lic com­ment. Com­ments will be accepted until Jan­u­ary 14th. The Notice of Pro­posed Rule­mak­ing is avail­able online here [PDF]. You can upload your com­ments using ECFS here, using pro­ceed­ing num­ber 09–191. You can read oth­ers’ com­ments on ECFS here. I’m writ­ing com­ments to sub­mit right now. I’ll post my com­ments here when I fin­ish. I encour­age every­one who loves the Inter­net and [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

Photo of Movie Pirate on Drudge?

I’m look­ing for­ward to James Cameron’s Avatar just like every­one else. But when I saw this photo on a Drudge Report head­line about the film, I got a lit­tle upset. Photo by John Shearer, Getty Images, 2009 Is that per­son in the aisle seat of the sec­ond row video­tap­ing the movie off the screen? Am I the only one who sees this? Never ever ever video­tape a movie in the the­ater. That’s called steal­ing, and it’s wrong. Never ever ever encour­age this kind of behav­ior by down­load­ing movies off the Inter­net. That’s steal­ing too, and just as wrong. As for the guy with the pizza, I’m going to assume [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

British Official Knows Nothing About First Amendment

Via Prawfs­blawg, a story from Reuters India reports that a British offi­cial has asked Cal­i­for­nia Gov­er­nor Schwarzeneg­ger to shut down a Web­site that she says encour­ages pros­ti­tu­tion in the UK. Pros­ti­tu­tion is legal in the UK. Quoth the offi­cial, Surely it can’t be too dif­fi­cult for “The Ter­mi­na­tor” to ter­mi­nate Pun­ter­net and that’s what I am demand­ing that he does. Patently, Ms Har­man is not acquainted with our First Amend­ment, which is pre­cisely what pre­vents “The Ter­mi­na­tor” from “ter­mi­nat­ing” such a Web­site. The Website’s owner responds with a brief les­son in free speech, then thanks Ms Har­man for the ben­e­fi­cial effects of her igno­rance: In clos­ing, I would [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

Zombieland, Paranormal Activity, & The Informant!

Being unem­ployed, I can go to the cin­ema on a Tues­day morn­ing and see three pic­tures in a row. This is pre­cisely what I did this week. I saw three films. The the­ater was also play­ing Michael Moore’s lat­est barf-​​​​fest, but I decided that I’ve had noth­ing to say about Michael Moore for years now and wouldn’t want to ruin a good thing. Zom­bieland I’ve never liked zom­bie films much, mostly because they are within the post-​​​​apocalyptic sur­vival genre I could never get into, since they invari­ably involve some self-​​​​sacrificing dip­shit who gets him­self killed in order to save the oth­ers, or “hero­ically” gets him­self infected so he’s [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

On Polanski’s Capture

Just remem­bered I for­got to com­ment on the recent cap­ture in Switzer­land of noto­ri­ous inter­na­tional fugi­tive and child rapist Roman Polan­ski, who appar­ently also has directed a num­ber of quite good movie-​​​​films. Lessons Polan­ski should learn from this affair: Don’t rape chil­dren. Don’t skip bail. Don’t plead guilty if you aren’t will­ing to do the max. DON’T RAPE CHILDREN!

De Minimis Establishment Clause Violations?

I just saw this ad on telly: The U.S. Depart­ment of Health and Human Ser­vices, in con­junc­tion with the Ad Coun­cil (both orga­ni­za­tions about which I have noth­ing pos­i­tive to say), has funded and pro­duced an adver­tise­ment fea­tur­ing reli­gious fig­ures endors­ing and pro­mot­ing gov­ern­ment pro­grams. No men­tion of the fea­tured anthro­po­mor­phic veg­eta­bles’ reli­gious affil­i­a­tion is men­tioned. Some­thing about using explic­itly reli­gious char­ac­ters to encour­age chil­dren to fol­low gov­ern­ment health advice strikes me as some­thing less than neu­tral to reli­gion, despite the sec­u­lar pur­pose. But because pro­mot­ing the health of chil­dren is a “legit­i­mate sec­u­lar pur­pose”, this kind of thing doesn’t vio­late the [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

PA Town Cancels Halloween

A town in PA has decided that trick-​​​​or-​​​​treating, some­thing chil­dren look for­ward to all year, is too unsafe for chil­dren. KDKA, via Pope­hat, via Over­lawyered. The Pope­hat arti­cle title sums up my thoughts pre­cisely: “To Save Child­hood, It Is Nec­es­sary To Destroy It.”