Archive for October, 2007

On the Inadequacy of English Invectives

Fred Phelps and his West­boro Bap­tist Church have, for some time now, been trav­el­ing the coun­try protest­ing at the funer­als of Amer­i­can sol­diers killed in the line of duty. Back in 2006, they protested out­side the funeral of Marine Lance Cor­po­ral Matthew Sny­der, who was killed in action at the age of 20. See this arti­cle, the orig­i­nal com­plaint, and Monica’s (of Spark a Synapse) post on the same topic for the unpleas­ant details. Eng­lish as a lan­guage lacks invec­tives of suf­fi­cient force and color to con­demn this kind of behav­ior in the terms jus­tice demands. How­ever, has WBC done any­thing prop­erly [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

Probulator

This week, I’ve been fill­ing out my “Appli­ca­tion to Reg­is­ter as a Can­di­date for Admis­sion to the Prac­tice of Law” in the State of Key Mid­west­ern Swing State. That is, an appli­ca­tion that I have to fill out before I can be per­mit­ted to fill out an appli­ca­tion to be allowed to take an exam­i­na­tion to see if I’m allowed to be a lawyer. Yes, it is an appli­ca­tion to be allowed to file another appli­ca­tion at some time in the future. Isn’t bureau­cracy a glo­ri­ous beast? Part of this appli­ca­tion is a “char­ac­ter ques­tion­naire.” See, you can­not be a lawyer in Key Mid­west­ern Swing State unless [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

Further Hinkiness

Net­flix has gone and done some­thing wonky that messed up the Net­flix wid­get and broke the site for a while. Lovely if(isset($var)) state­ments have fixed the prob­lem, but the queue still doesn’t show. At least, not from where I’m sit­ting. It might be a mag­pie issue. Your cache may vary. Either Net­flix changed the for­mat of the RSS feed with my queue in it, thereby mess­ing up the reg­u­lar expres­sions the Net­flix wid­get uses to extract per­ti­nent movie data from the feed, result­ing in a null set of results, and which will require actual work on my part to fix, or my cache [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

Announcing Hinkiness

The Seneschal regrets to announce that the MySQL data­base is behav­ing in a man­ner most unbe­com­ing a MySQL data­base. The post­ing of com­ments is directly affected. If you receive a MySQL error when try­ing to post a com­ment, please try again. And likely, again and again and again. It will even­tu­ally go through. Just click the “back” but­ton on your browser and your com­ment should still appear entered in the com­ment entry box. Just re-​​​​enter your name, email and URL (as needed) and reeval­u­ate the CAPTCHA and click sub­mit again. The Seneschal sug­gests that com­men­ta­tors copy the text of their com­ments to the clip­board [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

What About Copyrights?

News reporter gets the wrong prob­lem when report­ing on the fir­ing of a teacher for show­ing a boot­leg copy of The Simp­sons Movie to young stu­dents. The com­plaint is that show­ing a PG-​​​​13 film to 3d-​​​​5th graders is inap­pro­pri­ate. Noth­ing is said about how show­ing a boot­leg of such a film is inap­pro­pri­ate. In my not so hum­ble opin­ion, the lat­ter is the worse offense. The rat­ing sys­tem is pri­vate, vol­un­tary, and pretty arbi­trary. The film might well be just fine for chil­dren in a super­vised class­room set­ting. Copy­rights, how­ever, are the law. Teach­ers should be fired for infring­ing copy­rights in the class­room before we even [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

I Love My Toaster

Flib­bert blogs about the pos­si­bil­ity of peo­ple in the future mar­ry­ing robots. I had some thoughts on the topic that were far too long to post in his com­ments. Here they are. I agree that only things with rights can enter con­tracts. Mar­riage, being a con­stel­la­tion of legal rela­tion­ships akin to a con­tract, is only prop­erly avail­able to things with rights. One could not marry one’s toaster. One’s toaster is not a con­di­tional, voli­tional con­scious­ness. Its exis­tence is not an end in itself, it does not require sus­tained action to gain and achieve val­ues in order to con­tinue to exist, it is not required to [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

Everyone Else Is Doing It

[Note from the Cham­ber­lain: All fixed!] What Kind of Reader Are You? Your Result: Ded­i­cated Reader   You are always try­ing to find the time to get back to your book. You are con­vinced that the world would be a much bet­ter place if only every­one read more. Obsessive-​​​​Compulsive Book­worm   Book Snob   Lit­er­ate Good Cit­i­zen   Fad Reader   Non-​​​​Reader   What Kind of Reader Are You?Cre­ate Your Own Quiz And besides, it’s about all I have time for right now.