Announcing Astrolabe
The Chamberlain announces the completion of the Astrolabe. Please see the Clocks page. ~Chamberlain of Content
Archive for September, 2007
The Chamberlain announces the completion of the Astrolabe. Please see the Clocks page. ~Chamberlain of Content
If you aren’t watching the season finale of The Closer, the best written show on television right now, you’re not doing things right. Or you’re in some wonky time zone. See WoPSR.net Official Time for information on time zones.
Every good pragmatist knows that one of the absolutely essential functions of government is to own, operate, and maintain public roads. Several arguments I have heard advanced in favor of publicly-owned roads include: Uniform standards; Unrestricted access; Cost-free access; Universal access to an essential resource; Safety; Efficient allocation of scarce resources; Availability of eminent domain power to efficiently locate major roadways; And of course the vague but ever popular, “that’s what governments are for!” And every good economist knows that all of this is bunk. But is there something more nefarious in the institution of the public road? Consider cable television. [ . . . ]
Read the Rest...
Q: What’s spineless, blue, slow-moving, and leaves a layer of slime on everything it touches? A: [Link]
Alex Trebek asks a contestant, who boasts that she has slept in a hotel room floating on the Kwai river in Thailand, whether the original bridge (of cinema fame) is still there.
Some lively back-and-forth between Messrs. Inspector and Flibbertigibbet on urbanism, and Mr. Van Horn’s recent cable company travails got me thinking on the role of public roads in government’s ability to exert control over private property. This is mildly unfortunate, however, as I am far too busy at the moment to be thinking about such things. So I’ve popped it in the oven on a low roast for now, and later tonight I should have a tender, juicy morsel for you.
Since the beginning of the semester, the University has received a fairly consistent (and consistently bogus, but nonetheless consistently disruptive) stream of bomb threats. One day, one building. The next, another. It was almost like some lazy and mischievous undergraduate, displeased with the crepuscular hour of his first class of the day, decided to send a little email. A new one for each building for each day of the week. They were always resolved without incident, and an arrest was made after the second one. But alack, alas! The perpetrators are multifarious and independent, engaging in wicked, wicked copycat mischief! They have continued, [ . . . ]
Read the Rest...