Archive for the ‘ Technology ’ Category

The Producer, the Librarian, and the Promise-​​Breaker

TLDR: This changes noth­ing. Today the Librar­ian of Con­gress announced new rules pro­mul­gated pur­suant to the Librarian’s rule­mak­ing author­ity under the Dig­i­tal Mil­len­nium Copy­right Act to exempt cer­tain actions from the pro­hi­bi­tion against cir­cum­ven­tion of copy­right pro­tec­tion sys­tems found in 17 U.S.C. §1201. The “anti-​​​​circumvention pro­vi­sion” states: No per­son shall cir­cum­vent a tech­no­log­i­cal mea­sure that effec­tively con­trols access to a work pro­tected under this title. The Librar­ian is required by §1201 to make a deter­mi­na­tion every three years as to whether any exemp­tions from this pro­hi­bi­tion are nec­es­sary in order to pre­serve access to copy­righted works. In the words of the Librar­ian, his task [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

More Cable Woes

I don’t think I men­tioned it, but last August, right after I took the bar exam, I moved out of my law school apart­ment in Lesser North­east Key Mid­west­ern Swing State City and (shud­der) moved back in with my mother in Greater Key Mid­west­ern Swing State City, because I didn’t have a job. I still don’t have a job, but I do have an inter­view this week, so that might change. When I was in Lesser North­east Key Mid­west­ern Swing State City Just 20 Min­utes South of Greater North­east Key Mid­west­ern Swing State City, I had AT&T’s U-​​​​Verse prod­uct, which deliv­ered inter­net and tele­vi­sion over a cop­per pair. It’s almost exactly [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

FCC Ready to Kill Internet

Accord­ing to Reuters, FCC com­mis­sion­ers voted 5–0 today to pro­ceed with craft­ing a “net neu­tral­ity” rule, send­ing the cur­rent lan­guage (which would strip tele­com com­pa­nies of the right to con­trol how they use their own prop­erty) to the print­ing office for pub­lic com­ment. Com­ments will be accepted until Jan­u­ary 14th. The Notice of Pro­posed Rule­mak­ing is avail­able online here [PDF]. You can upload your com­ments using ECFS here, using pro­ceed­ing num­ber 09–191. You can read oth­ers’ com­ments on ECFS here. I’m writ­ing com­ments to sub­mit right now. I’ll post my com­ments here when I fin­ish. I encour­age every­one who loves the Inter­net and [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...

I Love My Toaster

Flib­bert blogs about the pos­si­bil­ity of peo­ple in the future mar­ry­ing robots. I had some thoughts on the topic that were far too long to post in his com­ments. Here they are. I agree that only things with rights can enter con­tracts. Mar­riage, being a con­stel­la­tion of legal rela­tion­ships akin to a con­tract, is only prop­erly avail­able to things with rights. One could not marry one’s toaster. One’s toaster is not a con­di­tional, voli­tional con­scious­ness. Its exis­tence is not an end in itself, it does not require sus­tained action to gain and achieve val­ues in order to con­tinue to exist, it is not required to [ . . . ]

Read the Rest...