The Golden Compass Preshow

Before watching The Golden Compass, I got to sit through lots of ads and trailers.

Citizen Soldier

The National Guard has a new and appallingly bad recruiting campaign, featuring a (commis­sioned?) “song” and “music video” by allegedly “popular” alter­native rock band, 3 Doors Down.

The video, which is over four minutes long, cuts between shots of the band performing on a blasted heath under a tenebrous sky (complete with bad, fake anamorphic lens flare), shots of National Guard soldiers helping recovery efforts in a disaster area of uncertain origin and locality (complete with obnoxious narrow shutter effect, a.k.a. the Saving Private Ryan Effect), and shots of American and British soldiers in a revo­lu­tionary war reen­actment, mostly in slow motion. All overlayed with floaty text saying weird stuff like “I fired the shot that started a nation.”

You can watch it here. And if you are an American taxpayer, you should. The National Guard spent an awful lot of your money on it.

I see what they’re doing. They think they can appeal to the young kids by using the popular music. But did they have to do it quite so cheesily? And last time I was an angsty teenager, author­i­tarian adults trying to “speak my language” was a major turn-​​off.

That, and “alter­native rock” just sucks.

The Spiderwick Chronicles

This is appar­ently also an adap­tation of a popular young adult novel series. I haven’t read this one, and from the looks of it, I won’t be.

Inkheart

Yet another novel adap­tation. They’re all starting to look exactly the same. The premise in this one is that Brendan Fraser has a special power — every story he reads aloud comes to life. Somehow, he brings a maniacal, power-​​hungry, world-​​dominating villain to life. Why, oh why did you do that, Brendan? Dumbass. Could be an inter­esting vehicle for other issues, but the premise is just a bit too fantastic for me.

Semi-​​Pro

Dear Will Ferrell,

Enough with the sports comedies, already. They suck, and you aren’t funny.

Love, Qwertz.

Speed Racer

The cartoon was one of the first Japanese animé to be imported to the U.S. The dialog was cheesy and stilted because the trans­la­tions were clunky. But there’s no excuse for the cheesy, stilted dialog in this trailer.

There were other things, but nothing memorable. I’m depressed that there’s so little out there forward to which to be looking.

  • Trackback are closed
  • Comments (4)
  1. In good humor, I can say that I have long wondered exactly what “cheesy” means. You have used the term several times. Would you define the idea it names?

    • Qwertz
    • December 9th, 2007 12:34am

    “Cheesy,” in the sense of being inferior, second-​​rate, cheap, or nasty, is attested from 1896, according to my OED. In the context of film production, the infe­ri­ority is manifest in overuse of clichéd conven­tions, sloppy production values, hiding production mistakes with inex­pensive digital effects, and a generally ham-​​handed approach to editing.

    “Cheesy” in other contexts may to refer to something that is showy, but vapid, or something osten­ta­tiously outdated.

    In all senses, it is distinct from simple infe­ri­ority or cheapness by being an attempt to reproduce high quality without under­standing its source.

    Occasionally, it might be used to refer to anything and every­thing from the 1970s, but I think this is not a very accurate usage at all.

    “Classy” is the appro­priate antonym, and class is the result of knowing what makes high quality and applying it.

    Both are slang terms, both orig­i­nating in the 1890s.

  2. Working from your comments, but in my own words:

    “Cheesy” iden­tifies a product that is inferior to the best on the market *because* its maker tried to create his product imita­tively, that is, by repro­ducing obvious features of superior products–but without under­standing the prin­ciples under­lying the features.

    More briefly: Cheesiness is creation by super­ficial imitation, not by essentialization.

    An example might be an architect who designs a building with a lot of sharp angles and new materials, in imitation of Frank Lloyd Wright, but without under­standing the prin­ciples, such as form and function, that Wright followed.

    Thank you.

    • James
    • December 9th, 2007 11:52pm

    And thank you both for providing a good working defi­n­ition for the term, which is often used so vaguely it can mean nothing more than “not good”!

    Some things I consider cheesy, off the top of my head:
    The magazine Architectural Record’s featured buildings, aesthet­i­cally speaking
    Family Guy
    Microsoft Windows, again aesthet­i­cally
    The Gap
    Sonic (as opposed to Mario)
    Toyota (esthet­i­cally)
    Most popular music
    Mozart

    Mostly aesthetic things come to my mind.

Comment are closed.