What About Copyrights?

News reporter gets the wrong prob­lem when report­ing on the fir­ing of a teacher for show­ing a boot­leg copy of The Simp­sons Movie to young students.

The com­plaint is that show­ing a PG-​​13 film to 3d-​​5th graders is inap­pro­pri­ate. Noth­ing is said about how show­ing a boot­leg of such a film is inap­pro­pri­ate. In my not so hum­ble opin­ion, the lat­ter is the worse offense. The rat­ing sys­tem is pri­vate, vol­un­tary, and pretty arbi­trary. The film might well be just fine for chil­dren in a super­vised class­room set­ting. Copy­rights, how­ever, are the law. Teach­ers should be fired for infring­ing copy­rights in the class­room before we even get to the ques­tion of whether the mate­r­ial was age-​​appropriate.

  • Trackback are closed
  • Comments (2)
    • John Kim
    • October 21st, 2007 9:33pm

    I agree with your post but I’ll just add this:

    “The rat­ing sys­tem is pri­vate, vol­un­tary, and pretty arbitrary.”

    The MPAA rat­ings are pri­vate in name but I believe they were forced upon the movie indus­try by the gov­ern­ment. Kind of a “cre­ate these rat­ings or else.” Also, they are dom­i­nated by a reli­gious ethics; sex is evil, etc. etc.. So, one could argue that they are not really voluntary.

    • Qwertz
    • October 22nd, 2007 10:07am

    The sys­tem was indeed cre­ated as a response to Con­gres­sional threats at cen­sor­ship. But no movie made is required by law to be sub­mit­ted to the rat­ing board.

    On the other hand, dis­tri­b­u­tion can be quite dif­fi­cult for a pro­duc­ers who do not obtain rat­ings. The major dis­trib­u­tors, the the­atres, and the MPAA all have con­trac­tual agree­ments effec­tively clos­ing the major dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nels to pro­duc­ers who do not play the game. And pay mem­ber­ship fees. In my year and a half as a pro­jec­tion­ist for Large National Movie The­atre Chain, we had lim­ited show­ings of NR films on only two occa­sions; both were exhib­ited from DVDs instead of film prints and were of con­sid­er­ably low budget.

    Today, rat­ings are mostly a mar­ket­ing tool. They are vol­un­tary on the level of the indi­vid­ual film, and are part of the producer’s mar­ket­ing con­sid­er­a­tion. Any pro­ducer could choose not to have his film rated and still release wide. The mar­ket is much harder for NR films (find­ing a dis­tri­b­u­tion, exhi­bi­tion, and an audi­ence can be tricky), but there’s noth­ing legally com­pelling par­tic­i­pa­tion by indi­vid­ual movies.

    The really sad part is that the sys­tem prob­a­bly isn’t vol­un­tary, even today. If MPAA did away with it, there’d be much gnash­ing of the teeth from all over the place, and Con­gress being Con­gress, we’d see a renewed push for a national cen­sor board. Yuck.

    ~Q

Comment are closed.